Book: Barak opposed strike on Syrian reactor
Defense Minister Ehud Barak is pushing for an Israeli
strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, but five years ago he was staunchly
opposed to the successful attack on Syria's reactor, a new book reveals.
According to foreign reports, the Israeli Air Force
bombed the reactor in Syria's Dir a-Zur region on September 6, 2007 under a
veil of secrecy. Only some six months later US government officials announced
that the destroyed target was a nuclear plant that was built with North Korea's
assistance.
Israel has never admitted to the bombing.
In their book "Spies Against Armageddon: Inside
Israel’s Secret Wars," Dan Raviv and Yossi Melman claim that Barak asked
to postpone the strike despite intelligence reports indicating that the reactor
would become operational within months.
Following a behind-the-scenes "war" with
then-Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Barak voted in favor of an
attack after realizing that it would be green-lighted by the government.
"If in 1991 it was Opposition Chairman Shimon Peres
who was against the strike (on Iraq's nuclear reactor), this time the opposition
came from within the government, and it astonished the cabinet ministers and
the security establishment," the book states.
"Barak did not say that he was against an attack in
Syria in principle, but argued that Israel can wait a few months. The problem
was that everyone else knew this wasn't the case, because radioactive materials
would have been placed in the reactor within months, and Israel couldn't risk
an attack that would pollute the environment. Olmert demanded that the cabinet
vote on the issue. Barak capitulated and joined the supporters."
The book also describes the ensuing rift between Olmert
and Barak, as well as the friction between Barak, then-IDF Chief of Staff Gabi
Ashkenazi and Meir Dagan, who served as the head of Mossad. "These disagreements
were to become scars that did not heal. The animosity between these people
escalated, and a few years later it would shape the debate surrounding the
Iranian nuclear (program)," Melman and Raviv assert.
"Barak is in favor of (striking Iran), while the
three others (Olmert, Ashkenazi and Dagan), despite not holding any official
titles, have lost their confidence in the defense minister's
calculations."
According to the authors, Olmert and the other senior
officials reached the conclusion that Barak's opposition to a strike in Syria
was driven by political and personal considerations related to the Winograd
Commission, which was due to publish its findings on the failures of the Second
Lebanon War.
"Ashkenazi, Dagan and particularly Olmert concluded
that the defense minister was hoping that the prime minister would have to
(resign) and that he – Barak – would be appointed (prime minister) in his place
or serve as defense minister in an alternative government headed by Benjamin
Netanyahu, in which he would be more influential," the book says.
"In such a case a successful attack in Syria would
be credited to him. Barak was aware of his rivals' claims and dismissed them
out of hand. He said that during the cabinet's deliberations he warned that (Olmert's)
moves were reckless."
Comments
Post a Comment